Juniper Publishers: Midurethral Slings Combined to Cosmetic Gynecologycal Surgeries: Our Experience of 13 Years
JUNIPER PUBLISHERS- JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY AND WOMEN’S
HEALTH
Journal of Gynecology and Women’s Health-Juniper
Publishers
Authored by Jack Isaac Pardo Schanz*
Short Communication
Almost over two decades ago the urogynecology
Experimentsignificant progress with the incorporation of midurethral
slings (MUS) for urinary stress incontinence treatment (USI).
Simultaneously, started a tendency to provide cosmetic gynecological
surgical procedures, wich in spite of being available in gynecological
practice Begun and to be standardized massive. Become a real
sub-specialty the Cosmetogynecology [1,2]. These procedures are mainly, labioplasty of labia Minora and Labia Mayora [3,4]. Colpoperineoplasty for Symptomatic Vaginal Amplitude/or Vaginal Relaxation Syndrome (VRS) [5]. usually known as vaginal rejuvenation Our last 13years experience is presented.
In this short communication we present the experience
of two urogynecologist and cosmetic gynecological surgeons in the
association of MUS with cosmetic gynecological surgeries (CGS). The
objective is to demonstrate that the high association presented makes
the SUI to be highly frequently observed associated to aesthetic genital
disorders as well as to feelings of VRS. With this association we want
to establish that urogynecologists should be, at least, prepared to
diagnose and treat or at least refer these patients in order to solve
both problems in one surgical act. Secondly, this review provides
important casuistry showing the distribution of the different slings
used by the authors.
All the MUS carried out by the two authors from
October 2003 until December 2016 Were reviewed. SUS carried out
previously are not included since we did not offer CGS before that date.
SUS conducted in public hospital were not included (more than 300)
since due to obvious reasons these were not likely to be combined with
CGS. Every MUS was listed by state of the art and device used. Everyone
was checked if CGS was made concomitantly. On the other hand, we wanted
to assess whether the SUS and CGS combination increases surgical
complications and / or adversely affect each other.



During the period under study1003 MUS were carried out. There was a total of 732 CGS in these patients (Table 1),
where percentage factor from total is not applied because some patients
had three CGS and others just one. MUS were distributed in 566 TVT-O,
34 Monarc, 80 Miniarc, 171 TVT Secure, 122 TVT, 21 TVT-Exact and
9Retroarc. In the same period, 234 labia minora labiaplasty (23.3%), 57
Lifting of labia majora (5.7%) and 441 colpoperineoplasty by vaginal
relaxation condition (44.0%) were made to these 1003 patients (Table 2).
Grouping the SUS in Transobturators (TVT-O and Monarc), 63,3%,
Minisling (Miniarc and TVT-Secure), 25,9% and retropubic (TVT, TVT exact
and Retroarc), 15,2%, show a not significantly different distribution
between transobturators and minisling concerning the CGS (Table 3).
But it is clear that patients who underwent retropubic SUS had less
CGS, which could be since they are older women with more severe IOE or
more complicated cases, where the main problem does not often supports
combination with CGS. Regarding patients who underwent MUS without CGS
associated, these are not over the 30% (28.2%) of all cases. On the
other hand, many patients with or without CGS had other(s) surgeries,
such as, colpoperineoplasty for genital prolapse with or without meshes,
hysterectomies, adnexectomies, laparoscopic tubal sterilizations. MUS
as isolated surgery are not more than 15% of our cases. We did not find
any associated complications or serious conditions due to combined one
CGS. Of course our important combination of MUS and CGS could be
influenced because in private practice patients looking for SUI and
Cosmetic procedures find in our team the overall resolution for their
complaints.
Conclusion
In our experience, SUS association with CGS is not
only very common but also safe. On the other hand, we believe that
associate a CGS, improves experience of patient, improves quality life
and saves time and money for something the patient thought anyway solve.
Images
42 years old patient para 3 vaginal deliveries. Labia
Minora Hipertrophia, Vaginal Laxitude and Urinary Stress Incontinence.
Surgeries: Laser Vaginal Rejuvenation (Colpoperineoplasty), Laser
labiaplasty and TVT-O (Figure 1-3).



Comments
Post a Comment